Jeff, Problem statement: suggested changes, several times, still waiting for those to be addressed in the draft. As my comments are not addressed, I don't think draft is ready for WGLC or RFC.
Architecture document: ready for WGLC, ready for RFC Dean On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Working Group, > > The original deadline for comments on WGLC for the problem statement and > architecture drafts of May 30 has passed with no comment whatsoever. > > While we all realize that there's a bit of exhaustion going on with regard > to these drafts, they are a bit of process we simply must get done in order > to fully move forward with our agenda of putting together data models. > > We are *NOT* going to hold that work up further - it is clear that there is > consenus to start making that progress. > > To assist us with putting this work behind us, please respond to the > following questions: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/ > Have you read the problem statement draft? > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? > (If no, please respond to the list with issues.) > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ > Have you read the architecture draft? > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? > (Ditto.) > > -- Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
