Yes, I would agree that if the YANG model is dropped the document is
both useful and sufficiently clear.
Yours,
Joel
On 6/10/14, 3:34 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:02:26PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
In my personal view, it is clearly outside of our remit to reinvent
logging, no matter whether we like it or not.
Agreed. Not in-scope for I2RS currently.
Where would you suggest such work be done?
As such, the structural specificity of a YANG model (or ABNF) simply
does not belong in this document. The clarity about what fields
will be logged is needed.
Would you agree that if the yang module is dropped that the info model is
sufficiently clear for I2RS purposes?
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
