On 6/10/14, 4:12 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:I have been silently following this discussion and I do not have a strong opinion but I think it might help to understand that a) NETCONF has a notification mechanism (RFC 5277), and b) SYSLOG has in its standards-track version support for carrying structured data (RFC 5424).Thanks, Juergen. I was aware, and I feel that once we decide on what gets logged, then we can certainly use mechanisms like these down the road to answer the "how" question.The text in section 4.1 made me believe you were not aware of structured data in SYSLOG. [...] So, while the data contained within the syslog message would adhere to this information model, and may be consumable by a human operator, it would not be easily parseable by a machine.
Ah, yes. Good catch. That can certainly be restated. Thanks. Joe _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
