On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > >I have been silently following this discussion and I do not have a > >strong opinion but I think it might help to understand that > > > >a) NETCONF has a notification mechanism (RFC 5277), and > > > >b) SYSLOG has in its standards-track version support for carrying > > structured data (RFC 5424). > > Thanks, Juergen. I was aware, and I feel that once we decide on what > gets logged, then we can certainly use mechanisms like these down the > road to answer the "how" question. >
The text in section 4.1 made me believe you were not aware of structured data in SYSLOG. [...] So, while the data contained within the syslog message would adhere to this information model, and may be consumable by a human operator, it would not be easily parseable by a machine. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
