I would agree with this assessment -- support without the yang model. A more generic multiple model might be nice if we need the illustration... Yang should be in a separate draft.
:-) Russ > On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:37 PM, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to see the draft adopted by the WG, without the YANG model. > > Thank you, > Joel > >> On 7/23/14, 1:26 PM, Joe Clarke wrote: >> At the meeting yesterday, the chairs called out a few non-chartered >> drafts that had progressed and should have a final decision made as to >> their future. One was our draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability. >> >> I would like to address the question the chairs raised on the draft and >> ask the WG if this can be adopted. The question was, should this draft >> be standalone or part of the architecture doc. >> >> This draft originally began as comments to Alia on the arch draft. Alia >> suggested that a draft outlining what should be logged for purposes of >> traceability should be created independent of the arch. Since then, the >> arch has had some traceability language added, but the details spelled >> out in draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability take these "breadcrumbs" and >> expand on them specific to what would be required for those needing to >> do diagnostic operations, accounting, and auditing. On top of that, the >> architecture draft is very well-baked right now, and would benefit from >> going through on its own. >> >> In that case, I feel that this draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability stands >> very much on its own and compliments the arch draft. >> >> Some of the feedback we've had on our latest rev (-02) was regarding the >> YANG model we added. The comments have been that a YANG model really >> isn't needed here. In fact, some of the general parts of this might fit >> in the new syslog model work happening in NETMOD. We would not be >> opposed to taking out this module, and retaining the English text >> explaining the importance of logging in I2RS as well as what should be >> logged. >> >> Therefore, we (the authors) would ask the WG for two things: >> >> 1. Closure on the YANG module question. >> 2. Adoption of draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability as a WG item >> >> Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
