Joel: Are proposing that Informational models are separate documents than data models?
Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:38 PM To: Joe Clarke; [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] Follow-up on draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability I would like to see the draft adopted by the WG, without the YANG model. Thank you, Joel On 7/23/14, 1:26 PM, Joe Clarke wrote: > At the meeting yesterday, the chairs called out a few non-chartered > drafts that had progressed and should have a final decision made as to > their future. One was our draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability. > > I would like to address the question the chairs raised on the draft > and ask the WG if this can be adopted. The question was, should this > draft be standalone or part of the architecture doc. > > This draft originally began as comments to Alia on the arch draft. > Alia suggested that a draft outlining what should be logged for > purposes of traceability should be created independent of the arch. > Since then, the arch has had some traceability language added, but the > details spelled out in draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability take these > "breadcrumbs" and expand on them specific to what would be required > for those needing to do diagnostic operations, accounting, and > auditing. On top of that, the architecture draft is very well-baked > right now, and would benefit from going through on its own. > > In that case, I feel that this draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability stands > very much on its own and compliments the arch draft. > > Some of the feedback we've had on our latest rev (-02) was regarding > the YANG model we added. The comments have been that a YANG model > really isn't needed here. In fact, some of the general parts of this > might fit in the new syslog model work happening in NETMOD. We would > not be opposed to taking out this module, and retaining the English > text explaining the importance of logging in I2RS as well as what > should be logged. > > Therefore, we (the authors) would ask the WG for two things: > > 1. Closure on the YANG module question. > 2. Adoption of draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability as a WG item > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
