Juergen,
While I understand the request, I presume that such a request can
not be met as a working group agreement in the time frame suggested.
WHile I hope that some of the folks who have been involved in proposing
the use of YANG for I2RS will write such a draft, I can not see how we
could even get tot eh point of WG adoption of such a draft, much less WG
rough consensus on the content, in the time frame you outline.
Of course, I am not one of the chairs or ADs, but it seems pretty
clear cut to me.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/29/14, 2:42 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Hi,
the NETMOD WG is holding an interim meeting on Sep. 17/18 [1] and one
of the agenda items is to work on any requirements I2RS might have for
YANG 1.1. For this, we need a clear definition of what the I2RS
requirements are for YANG 1.1, ideally posted as an I-D a few days
before the interim meeting so that people can come prepared. This
means there are ~15 days left to produce such a requirements writeup.
/js
[1] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim/netmod-2014-09-17.txt
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
