On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 09:58:57PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > Juergen, > While I understand the request, I presume that such a request can > not be met as a working group agreement in the time frame suggested. > WHile I hope that some of the folks who have been involved in proposing > the use of YANG for I2RS will write such a draft, I can not see how we > could even get tot eh point of WG adoption of such a draft, much less WG > rough consensus on the content, in the time frame you outline. > Of course, I am not one of the chairs or ADs, but it seems pretty > clear cut to me.
Joel, all I need is reasonably agreed upon input. Note that this request for input is not coming out of the blue, at least not for those I2RS folks who have been at the NETMOD meeting in Toronto. As NETMOD chair, I do have a target date to deliver YANG 1.1 and I take that milestone serious. My motivation to delay this by N months waiting for I2RS to get their input submitted is very small. I recall that there were presentations about "what is missing" bach in London, that is March 2014. The regular submission period for YANG 1.1 issues was 2014-02-23 until 2014-05-07. The interim meeting is mid September. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
