Joel,
On top of what Jürgen wrote, we stressed the need for such a requirement
document to both I2RS chairs during the last IETF meeting.
The good news is that some of the requirements were mentioned on the
microphone during the Sunday YANG editing session and/or the NETMOD
meeting (my memory fails me).
Regards, Benoit
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 09:58:57PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Juergen,
While I understand the request, I presume that such a request can
not be met as a working group agreement in the time frame suggested.
WHile I hope that some of the folks who have been involved in proposing
the use of YANG for I2RS will write such a draft, I can not see how we
could even get tot eh point of WG adoption of such a draft, much less WG
rough consensus on the content, in the time frame you outline.
Of course, I am not one of the chairs or ADs, but it seems pretty
clear cut to me.
Joel,
all I need is reasonably agreed upon input. Note that this request for
input is not coming out of the blue, at least not for those I2RS folks
who have been at the NETMOD meeting in Toronto.
As NETMOD chair, I do have a target date to deliver YANG 1.1 and I
take that milestone serious. My motivation to delay this by N months
waiting for I2RS to get their input submitted is very small. I recall
that there were presentations about "what is missing" bach in London,
that is March 2014. The regular submission period for YANG 1.1 issues
was 2014-02-23 until 2014-05-07. The interim meeting is mid September.
/js
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
