Nice phrase Alan :) I agree with all, let's name it 1.0 .
2013/5/17 Alan Kay <[email protected]>: > "Better" and "Perfect" are the enemies of "What Is Needed" > > ________________________________ > From: Walter Bender <[email protected]> > To: Daniel Narvaez <[email protected]>; Sean DALY <[email protected]> > Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing <[email protected]>; > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; iaep > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 6:21 AM > Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0 > > Perfection is the enemy of the good. > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> we need to decide if we want the next release to be 1.0 or 0.100. >> >> Here is the features we are planning for it. >> >> * Develop an HTML5 based toolkit for activities >> >> * Multiple selection in the Journal >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection >> >> * Enhanced support for 3G modems >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support >> >> * Background customization >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view >> >> * Multiple home views >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views >> >> * Integration with web services >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Web_services >> >> * Journal comments box >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Comment_box_in_journal_detail_view >> >> * Icon customization >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change >> >> >> It's a bit of weird situation because code wise we are not really 1.0 >> ready. >> We are developing a new toolkit and the old one could use an API cleanup. >> On >> the other hand we are deployed to millions of users. >> >> Personally I don't really have a strong feeling. If the marketing team >> sees >> an opportunity in a 1.0 in October with the above feature list I'd say to >> go >> ahead with it even if from a developer point of view we are not ready. >> Otherwise we could delay it at least another cycle. > > I think the marketing team had already reached consensus about 1.0. > But maybe Sean can chime in. > > >> >> -- >> Daniel Narvaez >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Marketing mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing >> > > Plus, I think .100 is confusing. > > -walter > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
