On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sean DALY <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98. >> >> Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of >> reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that >> Sugar is in its early alpha (which is clearly wrong IMHO.) > > > The problem is that Sean is also saying a 1.0 would be hard to market > (without html activities, which I don't think are going to be solid at the > first iteration). >
Speaking of "activities" in the Sugar sense, I was wondering how many of the HTML5 apps from FirefoxOS would slide over to our platform with little change. I just got my hands on a Geeksphone Peak (http://www.geeksphone.com/) and have been following up on how Mozilla does FirefoxOS apps. (As an aside, their apps live on Github, both as code and as zip files, and hosted through https://marketplace.firefox.com/ which looks similar on the phone as it does on a laptop). If some of the FirefoxOS apps can become Sugar HTML5 activities, we may be able to ramp up on the number of activities relatively soon. Wishful thinking, and all that... cheers, Sameer > So I don't really know how we should call this release. Maybe 1.0 and we > just don't make noise about it. Feels a bit like a lost opportunity though. > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
