I could be wrong but many people won't have time/stamina to try new things.
The web sugarizer is a good attempt for quick start with limited activities. Hope this can change quickly. Personally I suggest: 1. The quickest was to get users to have a taste of sugar is have a usb stick with sugar SOAS loaded with LiLi USB creator. It has a non-persistence mode and with the necessary VirtualBox run time installed. In Windows users just click and the brings Sugar up and runnung without any installation. 2. Support the idea that Sugar must be optimised to work with RPi2. It works with Rpi but no development or optimization to make it deployable. With 5 millions Rpi sold maybe we can get 1 million SugarRpi running :-) 3. Try to keep XOs deployment alive and support old/new XO with the best Sugar experience for learning. Cheers >-----Original Message----- >From: Leinonen Teemu [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 12:35 PM >To: 'IAEP SugarLabs' >Subject: Re: [IAEP] Planning for the future > >Hi, > >Sean’s idea of 1-click installers for Windows / MacOS / GNU/Linux makes a lot >of sense. If possible, by default it could be so that in a start screen on >could choose 1) Sugar 2) The other. Having installers for Android and iPad >would be great, too. > >Why? > >Bring your own device (BYOD >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bring_your_own_device) is becoming popular in >schools. In this case having one pedagogically visionary OS in the children’s >own devices would be great. > > - Teemu > >> On 1.3.2015, at 23.57, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Samuel, >> >> thanks for this >> >> I believe Sugar has had a clear pedagogical vision from day one, but has not >> had a strategy for some time. >> >> Outside the XO, Sugar's historical technical architecture has unfortunately >> kept it out of reach from all but the most determined and tech-savvy >> teachers (and journalists). Without a pancake button download and one-click >> installer, the installation barrier is too high. OLPC's historical focus on >> the hardware was never helpful either, and the main reason OLPC got mauled >> by incorrect memes was they didn't want to accompany journalists past the >> unfamiliarity barrier of the XO (hardware+software). >> >> In my view there are only a few ways to overcome this issue: >> >> * Develop 1-click installers for Windows / MacOS / GNU/Linux. I had >> suggested maintaining a matrix of preconfigured (i.e. languages/keyboards, >> prepopulated Journal, selection of Activities) VMs over Oracle VirtualBox, >> whose license allows free distribution for nonprofit and educational >> purposes. Upsides were immediate fullscreen Sugar experience without >> touching the configuration of the host computer. The downsides were huge VM >> images and the effort required to build and maintain the matrix. At the time >> I suggested we approach Oracle for corporate sponsorship, but some community >> members voiced objections. >> >> * Arrange for Sugar to be preinstalled on low-cost, reliable machines other >> than XOs. This is complex and would require a sales force (or working with a >> partner's) since no OEM will make that investment without a prospect of >> selling many thousands of units. As an alternative I had suggested we ride >> the wave of Raspberry Pi units (five million sold in three years) by >> developing an SD card for it based on Sugar on a Stick, but there was no >> interest in that effort. I still believe a Sugar-branded version (case + >> teacher starters kit -documentation) could have an impact. >> >> * Migrate to a web-based Sugar compatible with browsers on any platform. >> Lionel's Sugarizer is I think a fabulous solution. >> >> >> I've heard it suggested that marketing could do fund-raising, but donors >> large and small won't want to contribute unless there is a plan. I've been >> bewildered what the plan is for some time. >> >> Sean >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Samuel Greenfeld <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Disclaimer: The following are my views, and not the views of my current or >> past employers. >> >> About a year ago, I privately expressed concern that Sugar needed to ensure >> it had long-term sponsorship and a long-term user base. >> >> Since then, both the historical US-based OLPC organization and Sugar Labs >> have not publicly said much about their long-term plans, with OLPC also >> being rather closemouthed about the present. >> >> Meanwhile contributors silently leave. It is hard to justify volunteering >> when you don't know who will benefit besides mysterious "customers." >> >> Everyone seems happy to cite their past successes. No one corrects the >> press when they report stale information in their favor. >> >> >> There is no shame in being a smaller project. But we need to ask the hard >> questions. With Sugar, getting users and developers for a niche platform is >> a problem. With OLPC, everyone seems to love repeating the 2 or 2.5 million >> number for laptops historically shipped. Rarely is it asked how many XOs >> been shipped in the past year or are in active use & where. >> >> Sugar & OLPC need to come up with long-term strategies. While there is >> nothing public I have seen stopping One Education's XO Infinity from running >> Sugar, I haven't seen anything stopping it from running anything else. It >> is also unclear how much One Education is willing to engage with the >> historical Sugar & OLPC communities (or how much they can tell us at this >> time). >> >> >> Historically there have been many philosophical questions like "Does there >> need to be a physical machine?" and "Have we succeeded if every child has a >> computer, but from someone else?" >> >> I do not believe Sugar or OLPC is down for the count. But in order to >> engage One Education, governments, and other educational groups, both Sugar >> and the historical OLPC structure need to have plans to transition to the >> future. Otherwise these plans will be written for us. >> >> I suspect I know how things will end; but I wish it was not happening though >> silence. >> >> --- >> SJG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > >-------------------------------------------------- >Teemu Leinonen >http://teemuleinonen.fi >+358 50 351 6796 >Media Lab >http://mlab.uiah.fi >Aalto University >School of Arts, Design and Architecture >-------------------------------------------------- > >_______________________________________________ >IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >[email protected] >http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
