On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote:
> as a former SLOB, I could say that in the past this was because some > matters involving OLPC, or embargoed press information, or a partnership > with a third party, required confidentiality. > > Perhaps today's SLOBs have a different point of view > > That mostly sums things up. That said, the traffic on the list is close to nil. I generally use it as a CC to ensure that SLOB members see things, such as meeting notifications. Speaking of which, I managed to mess up (yet again) with the time for the most recent meeting of SLOB. It should have been scheduled at 16UTC, not 19UTC, as this is the time we had agreed to. Let's go back to 16UTC beginning next month. regards. -walter Sean > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 6 April 2016 at 03:25, James Cameron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The hiding of SLOBs deliberations once they move to their private >>> mailing list >>> >> >> Why is the SLOB list private? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SLOBs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
