Tony, What would be in place to explain, is why atfer the creation of the position (first motion) SLOBs are not openly requiring proposals from all community members and /or any interested party that might be adequate or experienced to execute the required functions.
In my opinion public email in IAEP + localization list + 15 -30 days to get proposals, should be enough to be called an "open call". Best regards, Laura 2016-04-06 22:44 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 6 April 2016 at 09:42, Walter Bender <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> the traffic on the list is close to nil >> >> >> Does the traffic include deliberation of motions? :) >> > > Never intentionally. When it does happen, we try to catch the mistake, > such as Adam reminding Tony to circulate his motion publicly, > > Also, in answer to an earlier question, yes, the ombudsman is a member of > the list. > > -walter > > -walter > > -walter > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > <http://www.sugarlabs.org> > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org Identi.ca/Skype acaire IRC kaametza Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
