On 11 June 2016 at 11:12, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave - I don't agree that whomever submits a grant application becomes the > treasurer for those funds.
Fair enough :) I am merely observing what I see as current practice with the Trip Advisor grant :) > What should happen is a sales cycle: if there is > interest, the SLOBs should be in the loop so they can assist with > face-to-face meetings, followup documents, and Adam/SFC liaison issues. > Document signings involving Walter require prior SFC review. In my view, > disbursal of funds from a successful grant should be managed by SFC/SLOBs > (perhaps primarily in the role of a Finance Manager or Treasurer), as per > Gould or TripAdvisor. Please could you clarify why Walter (or any other SLOB) would specifically need to be signing documents; I understand that that Conservancy signs the documents, because legally Conservancy is the party to them and neither SLOBs nor Members are agents of Conservancy and lack signing authority. Conversely, I don't see why SLOBS or Conservancy would be involved in the management of a project; they only and merely approve the funding, and until a Financial Manager is in place, this is done by regular motion. On 11 June 2016 at 16:44, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > What does the SFC say about the management of grant funds? I understand their policy is that spends have to be agreed by SLOB within the terms of the grant. -- Cheers Dave _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep