On 13/06/17 12:50, Samson Goddy wrote: > > Your mentioning Facebook, iPhone, Windows, Flash, LinkedIn etc, do > not fit with this agreement, so we would sincerely appreciate if > you do not promote these entities while representing Sugar Labs. > > Could you explain more, because i dont understand. And also how did > you think i might breach the agreement?
While your promoting these entities does not breach the wording of the agreement, I believe it goes against the spirit of it. Please review information on GNU.org such as the following articles, to understand why such technologies are distributed in bad faith. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/keep-control-of-your-computing.html https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-surveillance.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html On the other hand, these Sugar Activities (by you) don't have proper sources available. This actually is a breach of the agreement, and they should have been removed: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4759 http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4758 In accordance to the license file on those .xo bundles, I request that you share the source for the .swf Flash components embedded if you wrote them, otherwise please make sure they are removed from ASLO. Regards, Sebastian
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep