On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Samuel Greenfeld <sam...@greenfeld.org> wrote: > My experience with the SFC is that while they like to do license > enforcement, they are not platform purists. If you look at the bottom of > sfconservancy.org they have their own social media accounts. >
I completely agree with this. To say that it's all Free Software and nothing else is a mis-characterization. To take this extreme fundamentalist viewpoint would imply not being able to use web servers like Apache (Open Source, but not Free software). Sameer -- Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Professor, Information Systems San Francisco State University http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > > The ".fla" file at least in #4758 actually may be the source code in binary > format. I do not have access to a copy of Shockwave to verify that. > But without knowing the license for the flash content (unless Samson knows > the source; the README is for a different .fla, and I cannot find it) it is > unclear if the bundle as a whole can be GPL v3 licensed. > > I do not recall having an active ASLO account to check the other activity in > question. > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 13/06/17 12:50, Samson Goddy wrote: >> >> Your mentioning Facebook, iPhone, Windows, Flash, LinkedIn etc, do not fit >> with this agreement, so we would sincerely appreciate if you do not promote >> these entities while representing Sugar Labs. >> >> Could you explain more, because i dont understand. And also how did you >> think i might breach the agreement? >> >> >> While your promoting these entities does not breach the wording of the >> agreement, I believe it goes against the spirit of it. Please review >> information on GNU.org such as the following articles, to understand why >> such technologies are distributed in bad faith. >> >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/keep-control-of-your-computing.html >> https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-surveillance.html >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html >> >> On the other hand, these Sugar Activities (by you) don't have proper >> sources available. This actually is a breach of the agreement, and they >> should have been removed: >> >> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4759 >> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4758 >> >> In accordance to the license file on those .xo bundles, I request that you >> share the source for the .swf Flash components embedded if you wrote them, >> otherwise please make sure they are removed from ASLO. >> >> Regards, >> Sebastian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SLOBs mailing list > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep