IATMI sedang mengadakan worshop “carbonate complexity :  characterization, 
modeling and simulation” di Yogyakarta dari 22-25 April 2008. Workshop dihadiri 
sekitar 80 orang dari berbagai institusi pemerintah, oil companies, service 
companies, dan perguruan tinggi.
   
  Workshop didahului oleh kursus satu hari tentang aspek geologi dan reservoir 
engineering karbonat dibawakan oleh Alit Ascaria (Premier Oil) dan Doddy 
Abdassah (ITB).
   
  Workshop dibuka pada 23 April 2008 oleh Ketua IATMI Kuswo Wahyono, 
dilanjutkan dengan pidato sambutan oleh John Sinulingga mewakili Pertamina 
Eksploitasi (panitia workshop adalah IATMI Komda Cirebon –Pertamina), dan 
pidato/presentasi kunci dari Handoyo Eko Wahono (BPMIGAS) tentang 
lapangan-lapangan karbonat yang dikembangkan dalam lima tahun terakhir, Bob 
Yulian (BPMIGAS) tentang kemajuan eksplorasi target karbonat di Indonesia, dan 
Gatot Kariyoso Wiroyudo (Shell) tentang investasi teknologi Shell dalam 
mengerjakan karbonat.
   
  Makalah teknis yang dipresentasikan sebanyak 16 makalah. Workshop diselingi 
dengan fieldtrip ke Gunung Kidul mengunjungi singkapan karbonat Wonosari. 
   
  Pembicara mendapatkan kesempatan berbicara cukup tenang karena waktu yang 
diberikan antara 20-30 menit, pertanyaan 5-10 menit. Workshop ini jelas 
bermanfaat menambah wawasan aspek GGRE karbonat. Karbonat merupakan objektif 
sangat penting karena menyusun sekitar 50 % reservoir lapangan2 produksi di 
Indonesia. Bahkan dalam lima tahun terakhir, 54 % recoverable reserve 
lapangan-lapangan baru berasal dari  reservoir karbonat, maka karbonat tak 
kalah penting dari reservoir silisiklastik, bahkan bisa lebih.
   
  Saya diundang IATMI berkontribusi makalah tentang geologi regional karbonat 
di Indonesia. Di bawah ini adalah abstraknya, semoga berguna.
   
  Mahasiswa tidak banyak yang hadir. Karena merasa ada yang kurang kalau saya 
hanya mempresentasikan makalah saya kepada para profesional di workshop, maka 
pada hari yang sama saya ke UGM dan mempresentasikan materi yang sama di 
hadapan para mahasiswa tetapi dalam format penyampaian kepada mahasiswa.  
Setelah itu, masih di UGM, saya melanjutkan mempresentasikan makalah 
”Sandhyakala ning Jenggala dan Majapahit : Hipotesis Kebencanaan Geologi” – 
kali ini jauh lebih tenang tak seperti saat mempresentasikan makalah ini di PIT 
IAGI 2007 Bali yang mesti berpacu dengan waktu yang terbatas. Waktu yang 
terbatas atau terburu2 akan menyulitkan pendengar mencerna materi yang 
disampaikan. Sebagai informasi, hipotesis ini telah ”ditangkap” National 
Geographic Channel untuk  menjadi tayangan (pengambilan gambar sudah dilalukan) 
di dalam film dokumenter ”LUSI”.
   
  Demikian, laporan singkat.
  awang – Grand Mercure – 24/4/2008, 02.15
   
  LAMPIRAN 
   
  Geologic Controls on Carbonate Reservoirs in Indonesia : 
  Regional Overview
   
  Awang Harun Satyana
   
  (BPMIGAS)
   
  Carbonate reservoirs are characterized by extreme heterogeneity of porosity 
and permeability. This is related to the complexities of the original 
depositional environment and the diagenetic influences that can modify the 
original textures. Wide variety of environmental facies and diagenetic changes 
express controls of geologic factors. Therefore, in characterizing carbonate 
reservoirs, it is important to evaluate geologic controls which influence 
carbonate sedimentation and diagenesis. 
   
  Being located at warm humid tropical shallow water, in Indonesia carbonates 
are geographically and temporally widespread. They occur in a range of ages and 
depositional settings which were often affected by coeval tectonism, 
siliciclastic input or volcanism. The carbonates developed in various tectonic 
settings of back-arc, intra-arc, fore-arc, and foreland basins; island arc; 
micro-continents; and continental passive margins. They developed as patch 
reefs of land-attached platform such as Baturaja buildups in South Sumatra and 
West Java, fringing reefs such as Kais buildups on Arar High, the Bird’s Head 
of Papua, barrier reefs such as Ujung Pangkah reefs in East Java, and pinnacle 
reefs overlying offshore isolated platforms such as reefs of the Cepu High, 
East Java and Arun reefs in North Sumatra. In each a variety of carbonate 
depositional systems, the reefs often developed on structural highs. 
Subsidence, uplift, active faulting, tilting or associated
 silici/volcaniclastic input strongly affected facies variability, 
stratal/platform geometries, sequence development and carbonate termination. 
These geologic factors influence distribution and continuity of the carbonate 
reservoirs.
   
  Ages of carbonates influence the basic ingredients of carbonates. Diversity, 
abundance, dominant mineralogy, and relative importance of sediment-producing 
marine invertebrates are various through the geologic periods. This will 
influence the response of carbonates when they are changed by diagenesis. 
Producing carbonate reservoirs in Indonesia range in ages from the Jurassic 
Manusela fractured oolitic carbonates in Seram Island, Eastern Indonesia to 
Pliocene globigerinid limestones of the Madura Strait. Paleogene carbonates in 
Indonesia are commonly dominated by larger foraminifera. These carbonates 
typically form large-scale platforms or isolated shoals. Good poroperms can be 
preserved in shoal or redeposited carbonates lacking micrite. Secondary 
porosities developed due to fracturing, chemical dissolution during burial, or 
as karstic cavities. However, the opportunities for leaching were limited. 
Neogene carbonates often contain abundant aragonitic bioclasts, such as
 corals. They typically develop as reefal buildups, shelfal deposits or as 
isolated platforms. Compared with Paleogene carbonates, poroperms are generally 
higher in Neogene carbonates, various porosities all occur. The most important, 
common and economic carbonate reservoirs in Indonesia are the Miocene buildups 
such as Arun in North Sumatra, Baturaja in South Sumatra and West Java, Kujung 
I or Prupuh in East Java, and Kais in Salawati, Papua.
   
  Petrographic studies of carbonate reservoirs in Indonesia have shown that 
they have been subjected to a number of diagenetic processes including 
compaction (stylolization), dissolution, cementation, neomorphism, 
silicification, dolomitization and fracturing.  Most of these processes are 
common to all depositional facies types (reefal, near reef, shallow shelf and 
outer shelf open marine). Original particle types of the sediments inherited 
from the deposition play an important role in this respect. Interconnected 
corallites commonly suffer dissolution resulting in porosities. Neomorphism is 
especially common in micritic carbonates reducing their porosities.  
Dolomitization has a varied distribution and in many cases is associated with 
clay minerals. It may affect reservoir poroperms and be a factor in generation 
of undesirable non-hydrocarbon gases. Stylolization and silicification are 
localized features. Study of sequence of diagenetic events is important for 
knowing the
 preservation or occlusion of porosities.
   
  An understanding of the geologic controls on carbonate depositional 
environments, spatial and temporal facies distributions and controls on 
deposition and diagenesis is essential in order to characterize carbonate 
reservoirs and to evaluate their considerable economic potential.***

       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

Kirim email ke