Saya tergelitik untuk ikut menulis akan hal ini . 

Berdasarkan pengalaman kerja di perusahaan beda bangsa dan benua, ternyata  
Tuhan telah menunjukan kebesarannya . Dan Benar Negeri penghasil (Kaya sumber 
Daya Alam)  umumnya memang tidak sekaya negeri Penjual (Tidak ada sumber daya) 
.. Karena Tuhan tidak pernah mempersatukan Negeri Kaya , Orangnya Pintar dan 
Pekerja Keras dalam Satu Bangsa . 

1, Israel  
Dikenal karena Umumnya orang pintar bahkan negri sebesar Amerika bisa diatur .. 
Ternyata Tidak Punya SUmber Daya alam bahkan air pun mereka rebutan dengan 
Palestine. Tapi Tuhan menciptakan Otak Mereka sangat Brillian .. Pengalaman 
saya kerja dengan Orang "peranakan Israel - Yahudi" adalah mereka bekerja 
sangat Sistematis dan Cerdas. Kelemana Mereka Cenderung Malas.  Mark Zukleberg 
(Facebook) , Albert Einsten dan Stave Jobs (katanya) dan Beckham (gara2 Tato 
bahasa Yahudi)  adalah contoh orang peranakan Israel   
2. Jepang 
Negeri ini sumber daya alamnya hampir tidak ada , mereka bergantung pada Gas 
dan Nuklir , Rajin dikujungi Tsunami dan Gempa . Tapi negeri mereka sukses 
walau harus ditecapai dengan kerja keras. Bangsa Jepang bisa bekerja 3x lebih 
rajin dari orang manapun didunia. Waktu kerjsa sama mereka Timesheet mereka 
bisa 300 jam kerja sebulan normalnya orang hanya 160-180 jam/bulan,   walau 
kadang - kadang dikantor mereka suka tertidur, namanya manusia . Jadi Jepang 
sukses karena  bekerja keras, Pintar ... wkwkwkwk Orang jepang tidak ada yang 
pintar .. Kalau Pintar kenapa kalau gagal pakai Harakiri ..  (bunuh diri).. 
Pernah sekali waktu saya maju proposal kerja mereka bilang "Kalau Gagal 
Harakiri ya .. " walau bercanda tapi saya takut .. 
3.Indonesia 
Orang Indonesia itu sebenarnya Pintar dan Rajin .. tapi kenapa kita tidak 
sesukses dua bangsa diatas , lha wong negri kita subur , kata Koes Plus .. 
"Bukan Lautan Hanya Kolam Susu, Batang Kayu dilempar jadi pohon singkong .. 
Ikan Melimpah Ruah .. Hutan ada, Minyak-Gas Batubara - Mineral ada, Arab Saudi 
pun tidak seperti ini kayanya , mereka memang punya minyak  luar biasa .. tapi 
tanahnya Tandus, Mineral nggak ada , perikanan jauh lah .. Yang terjadi kita 
jadi malas, dan malas pangkal kebodohan ... Mau enaknya serba Instan , Mangan 
ra Mangan Kumpul .. Akhirnya kita dikerjain sama orang - orang 1 dan 2 diatas. 

Nah Bayangkan kalau ada bangsa Pintarnya seperti Israel , Pekerja keras seperti 
Jepang dan Alamnya sekaya Indonesia ... Bangsa Ini akan Jadi bangsa paling 
superior di Dunia ... Maka dari itu Tuhan tidak menciptakan mereka dalam satu 
bangsa ... Inilah kebesarannya .. 

Amin .. 

Dandy 
Teronggok sendiri di Malaysia dan ternyata Orang Malaysia itu Lugu ya ......

Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:20:04 +0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] No resource, become resourceful

Ada hipotesa menarik tentang negara yang punya SDA yang kaya cenderung 
mempunyai pertumbuhan ekonomi yang lebih rendah 
dan hasil pembagunan yang lebih buruk di banding negara yang mempunya lebih 
sedikit SDA.
Hipotesanya di sebut Resource curse atau Paradox of Plenty bisa dilihat di 
wiki..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse


Regards

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:59 PM, noor syarifuddin <[email protected]> 
wrote:



Prof,
 
Mungkin maksudnya, negara yang miskin sumber daya alam maka penduduknya lebih 
militan untuk bertahan hidup. Ini mungkin alami saja: anak orang miskin 
biasanya lebih banyak akalnya daripada anak orang kaya....walaupun belum tentu 
berlaku secara keseluruhan. Namun pendapat ini menjadi menarik karena didukung 
data survey, jadi secara statistik (mudah-mudahan) bisa dipertanggung jawabkan.

 
Contoh lain: India yang termasuk kategori negara miskin SDA. Salah satu yang 
menonjol hanyalah tambang batubara yang produksinya habis dipakai sendiri untuk 
PLTU. Peredaran dan harga batubara dikontrol dengan ketat oleh negara karena 
dinilai strategis. Mereka sekarang juga harus impor (termasuk dari Indonesia) 
karena sudah defisit batubara akibat kebutuhan listrik yang melonjak sejalan 
dengan lajunya industri dan naiknya GDP.

 
Populasi India sekarang sekitar 1.2 milyar. India dengan cerdiknya masuk ke 
celah-celah bisnis dengan memanfaatkan SDM yang luar biasa melimpah. Setiap 
tahun ada ratusan ribu engineer yang lulus dari ratusan PT di sana (walaupun 
kondisi kampusnya sangat payah dan kumuh, tapi saya terkesima dengan banyaknya 
publikasi dan paten yang mereka punyai). Dengan didukung juga oleh warisan 
"jiwa" dagang dan wiraswasta, maka industri mereka juga sudah melahirkan banyak 
perusahaan kelas dunia: Unisys, WinPro, Tata, Great Eastern dll. Bangaluru 
(nama baru Bangalore) merupakan salah satu andalan industri jasa/service 
mereka. Di sana "berkantor" banyak perusahaan Amerika/Eropa yang dikelola oleh 
para perusahaan jasa konsultan tsb di atas. Kampus (kantor) Unysis di Bangalore 
berpegawai sekitar 14,000 (dari total sekitar 130 ribu pegawainya di seluruh 
dunia). Beberapa perusahaan minyak besar termasuk yang "berkantor" di sana.....

 
Memang ada jug ayang meragukan apakah model industri jasa akan cocok untuk 
negara dengan populasi besar seperti India itu. China lebih memilih industri 
manufaktur yang dirasa lebih cocok. Apapun juga, mereka lebih jeli dalam 
mencuri kesempatan dalam kesempitan, mereka lebih jeli dalam ngalap berkahnya 
bisnis SDA termasuk minyak dan gas...

 
 
 
salam,
 
 



From: "R.P.Koesoemadinata" <[email protected]> 
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:14:07 +0700
To: <[email protected]>
ReplyTo: <[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] No resource, become resourceful


Ini benar kalau kita menganut 'free market economy". Natural resources tidak 
perlu dipunyai, yang perlu dipunyai adalah duit. Punya natural resources tapi 
tidak punya duit untuk mengexploitasinya percuma saja, akhirnya di exploitasi 
oleh orang lain yang punya duit.

Negara yang tidak punya natural resources, tetapi punya banyak duit seperti 
jangan jauh-jauh Singapore saja, banyak keuntungannya, BBM dan gas  dapat beli 
dengan harga pasaran international, sama dengan negara penghasil BBM (kalau 
tidak disubsidi, dan subisidi itu haram dalam free market economoy), tidak ada 
kerusakan lingkungan, bebas dari masalah2 lingkungan, pembebasan lahan, demo 
dsb.

Jadi yang penting dalam free market economy adalah punya duit yang banyak, 
tidak perlu punya natural resources. Natural resources di seluruh dunia dapat 
dibeli tanpa harus menanggung dampaknya.

Tentu lain kalau ini dalam economi kerakyatan, di mana rakyat harus langsung 
menikmati natural resources itu dengan harga explorasi produksinya, tanpa 
mempersoalkan "lost opportunity" mendapatkan keuntungan dengan menjualnya ke 
luar negeri.

RPK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: o - musakti 

To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:17 AM
Subject: [iagi-net-l] No resource, become resourceful






Artikel menarik mengenai korelasi terbalik dari natural resources dan tingkat 
pendidikan suatu negara.....


Skills not drill for survival
Illustration: michaelmucci.com

Every so often someone asks me: ''What's your favourite country, other than 
your own?'' I've always had the same answer: Taiwan. ''Taiwan? Why Taiwan?'' 
people ask.

Very simple: because Taiwan is a barren rock in a typhoon-laden sea with no 
natural resources - it even has to import sand and gravel from China for 
construction - yet it has the fourth-largest financial reserves in the world.


Because rather than digging in the ground and mining whatever comes up, Taiwan 
has mined its 23 million people, their talent, energy and intelligence.

Advertisement: Story continues below
I always tell my friends in Taiwan: ''You're the luckiest people in the world. 
How did you get so lucky? You have no oil, no iron ore, no forests, no 
diamonds, no gold, just
 a few small deposits of coal and natural gas - and because of that you 
developed the habits and culture of honing your people's skills, which turns 
out to be the most valuable and only truly renewable resource in the world 
today. How did you get so lucky?''


That, at least, was my gut instinct. But now we have proof.

A team from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 
has just come out with a fascinating little study mapping the correlation 
between performance on the program for international student assessment (PISA) 
examination - which tests the maths, science and reading comprehension skills 
of 15-year-olds in 65 countries, every two years - and the total earnings on 
natural resources as a percentage of gross domestic product for each 
participating country. In short, how well do your high school children do 
compared with how much oil you pump or how many diamonds you dig?


The results indicated ''a
 significant negative relationship between the money countries extract from 
national resources and the knowledge and skills of their high school 
population,'' says Andreas Schleicher, who oversees the PISA exams for the 
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ''This is a global 
pattern that holds across 65 countries that took part in the latest PISA 
assessment.'' Oil and PISA don't mix. As the Bible notes, Schleicher says, 
''Moses arduously led the Jews for 40 years through the desert, just to bring 
them to the only country in the Middle East that had no oil. But Moses may have 
gotten it right, after all. Today, Israel has one of the most innovative 
economies, and its population enjoys a standard of living most of the oil-rich 
countries in the region are not able to offer.''


So hold the oil, and pass the books. In the latest PISA results, students in 
Singapore, Finland, South Korea, Hong Kong and Japan stand out as having high 
PISA
 scores and few natural resources, while Qatar and Kazakhstan stand out as 
having the highest oil rents and the lowest PISA scores. (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, 
Oman, Algeria, Bahrain, Iran and Syria stood out in the same way in a similar 
2007 test, while, interestingly, students from Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, 
Middle East states with few natural resources, scored better.)


Also lagging in recent PISA scores, though, were students in many of the 
resource-rich countries of Latin America, like Brazil, Mexico and Argentina. 
Africa was not tested.

Canada, Australia and Norway, also countries with high levels of natural 
resources, still score well on PISA, in large part, argues Schleicher, because 
all three countries have established deliberate policies of saving and 
investing these resource rents, and not just consuming them.


Add it all up and the numbers say that if you really want to know how a country 
is going to do in the 21st century,
 don't count its oil reserves or goldmines, count its highly effective 
teachers, involved parents and committed students.

Economists have long known about the ''Dutch disease'', which happens when a 
country becomes so dependent on exporting natural resources that its currency 
soars in value and, as a result, its domestic manufacturing gets crushed as 
cheap imports flood in and exports become too expensive.


What the PISA team is revealing is a related disease: societies that get 
addicted to their natural resources seem to develop parents and young people 
who lose some of the instincts, habits and incentives for doing homework and 
honing skills. By contrast, says Schleicher, ''in countries with little in the 
way of natural resources - Finland, Singapore or Japan - education has strong 
outcomes and a high status … Every parent and child in these countries knows 
that skills will decide the life chances of the child and nothing else is going
 to rescue them, so they build a whole culture and education system around it''.

Or as my Indian-American friend K.R. Sridhar, the founder of the Silicon Valley 
fuel-cell company Bloom Energy, likes to say: ''When you don't have resources, 
you become resourceful.''


That's why the foreign countries with the most companies listed on the Nasdaq 
are Israel, China/Hong Kong, Taiwan, India, South Korea and Singapore - none of 
which can live off natural resources.

But there is an important message for the industrialised world in this study, 
too. In these difficult economic times, it is tempting to buttress our own 
standards of living today by incurring even greater financial liabilities for 
the future. To be sure, there is a role for stimulus in a prolonged recession 
but ''the only sustainable way is to grow our way out by giving more people the 
knowledge and skills to compete, collaborate and connect in a way that drives 
our countries
 forward'', Schleicher argues.

In sum, he says, ''knowledge and skills have become the global currency of 21st 
century economies, but there is no central bank that prints this currency. 
Everyone has to decide on their own how much they will print.''


Sure, it's great to have oil, gas and diamonds; they can buy jobs. But they'll 
weaken your society in the long run unless they're used to build schools and a 
culture of lifelong learning.

This article was first published in The New York Times.




Read more: 
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/skills-not-drills-for-survival-20120311-1us9o.html#ixzz1opyxi3ig


                                          

Kirim email ke