+1
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:11:45 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote: > > Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability. To date we've never had a 2- > > phase release. We'll start that as of the next release. > > It doesn't have to two actual phases, in the "release candidate / final > release" sense. It's just a matter of following up with a vote after the > initial release.. > > This isn't an official ASF release, but we might get into the habit of > confirming the release grades on the list. > > Clinton's message already counts as a +1. If Larry and Brandon were to chime > in, we could call it a done deal. > > As mentioned, I'm not big on voting for the sake of voting, in the fashion of > Jakarta projects :), but the ASF takes release grades seriously, and we > should get in the habit of holding release votes on the DEV list. > > Other than that, it should be business as usual for us. :) > > -Ted. > >
