+1

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : vendredi 14 janvier 2005 11:10
À : ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])


OK, how about Sunday, 16 Jan 2005, at 23:59 PST, then? 

After giving SourceForge a day to catch up, we could submit the repositories
on Tuesday. 

-T.

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:10:07 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> The only thing I don't like about that is that it takes away the
> entire weekend for development.  Could we freeze monday?  Or
> perhaps the weekend is the best time for the infrastructure team to
> do the import?
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:28:17 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> WUSH.NET also does a nightly dump. It might be best if we froze
>> the subversion repository at the same time, so that they were
>> both available to infrastructure.
>>
>> I never got an answer about which one it was better to do first,
>> so we can let whoever does it decide.
>>
>> Did we want to pick a time, then? It would be helpful if we were
>> definite in the board report as to when we are moving forward.
>>
>> How about, say, Friday 14-Jan-2005 at 23:59 Pacific Standard Time?
>>
>> We'd then be able to submit it to infrastructure by Monday.
>>
>> Of course, people can still continue to work offline and then
>> synch up with the repository. We would just have to be more
>> careful about coordinating work for a few days so as to avoid
>> conflicts.
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:32:36 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ted,
>>>
>>> Yes, 2.0.9 is general availability.  To date we've never had a
>>> 2- phase release.  We'll start that as of the next release.
>>>
>>> As for the date, we could move any time. However we do it,
>>> we'll need
>>> to wait about 24 hours after the last commit to allow time for
>>> SF.net
>>> to create the nightly tarball of the repository.  I'll put a
>>> tracer file in as the last commit, to ensure that the tarball
>>> contains all of the latest changes.  When the time comes, I'll
>>> remove everyone's access to the SF CVS repository and then
>>> start the 24 hour freeze.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Clinton
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:25:44 -0500, Ted Husted
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The quarterly board report is due.
>>>>
>>>> Could we set a firm date for the transfer of the CVS and SVN
>>>> repositories?
>>>>
>>>> The day the repositories are transferred, we would be able to
>>>> apply for graduation.
>>>>
>>>> The vote for the MyFaces graduation is pending now. It would
>>>> be nice if we were next. :)
>>>>
>>>> -Ted.
>>>>
>>>> PS - Is iBATIS 2.0.9 considered a "General Availability"
>>>> release?
>>>>
>>>> --- Original Message ---
>>>> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: <general@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:04:40 -0500
>>>> Subject: *** QUARTERLY STATUS REPORTS ***
>>>>
>>>>> The Incubator's Quarterly Report is due next week.  All
>>>>> projects should e-mail a brief status report (and make sure
>>>>> that their STATUS file is up to date) by the weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mentors, you don't have to do the report yourself, but
>>>>> please do make sure that it gets done.  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone should feel free to reply with any items that you
>>>>> feel are
>>>>> going well with the Incubator, or could be improved to make
>>>>> the Incubator work better.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Noel



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
 

Reply via email to