RE: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long])

[roberto]

Clinton, I think Ted updated his suggested dir structure in the Wiki Roadmap page:   http://wiki.apache.org/ibatis/Roadmap   The final structure (after some intermediate structure he has also proposed due to the move) is a little similar to yours with the diffs being:   ·         the location of the branches/tags directories (created as needed) ·         the trunk dir (each subdir has its own) ·         the docs dirs (one each in Java and .NET/C# subdir) ·         and the 2 *PetS* dirs (one each in Java and .NET/C# subdir)   I'm pasting in that proposed final structure and some of his text into this email so it's quicker to see for other folks on this email list:     So, the root folders are /cs /java /site Of these, /java and /cs each have subfolders. Each of the subfolders have their own trunk. /java * /core * /dao * /docs * /jpetshore /cs * /core * /dao * /docs * /npetshop * /tutorial The /site folder has the Forrest sources for the website, and it's own /trunk Any folder that needs a tags folder (or branches folder) can create one as needed. But there's no point in creating one until it's needed.     Roberto       > -----Original Message----- > From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:11 PM > To: ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long]) > > -1 On SVN directory structure > > Oops, I don't like the idea of having multiple /tags and /trunk > directories.  I really don't see the advantage, and it may just make > the repository harder to browse.  I don't like calling the root > directory of the project "Source", because we have more than source > within a project structure, as well as the fact that there is another > source directory below that.  I don't like "/Source/iBatisJava/src/", > which is what we'd end up with (both redundancy and contradictory). > I'd rather stick with the more traditional approach, and keep the root > of the trunk at a "project" level (not referring to project artifacts > like "source").  So I'd suggest something like this: > > /branches > /tags > /trunk > ./iBatisNet > ./NPetShop > ./iBatisJava > ../ibatis-1 > ../ibatis-2 > ./JPetStore > ../jpetstore-1 > ../jpetstore-2 > ../jpetstore-3 > ../jpetstore-4 > ./site > ./documentation > ../tutorial > ../devguide > > +1 on separating DAO (later) > > This shouldn't be an issue to do this later.  I've always wanted to do > this, but never had the motivation.  :-)  This could either happen > below the .NET and Java source directories if we still considered them > part of the same project, or we could rename iBatisNet and iBatisJava > to NetMapper and JavaMapper respectively.  Then introduce NetDAO and > JavaDAO (or whatever) later.  These points are less important because > SVN makes our lives somewhat easy in this respect.  More important is > the previous discussion of the root of the repository. > > +1 on the removal of 3rd party (non-ASF) libraries. > > I'll remove all non-ASF libraries tomorrow and write devsrc code for > them (like I did for TopLink). > > Cheers, > Clinton >