> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ted Husted 
> Envoyé : dimanche 16 janvier 2005 13:21
> À : ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Objet : SVN Recap (was RE: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long]))
> 
> Just to recap,
> 
> * I'd suggest that the SVN structure represent the subproject/release
> structure, where the subprojects are
> 
> ** java/mapper
> ** java/dao
> ** java/docs
> ** java/jpetshore
> 
> ** cs/mapper
> ** cs/dao
> ** cs/docs
> ** cs/npetshop
> ** cs/tutorial
> 
> ** site
> 
>   If we later change the release structure, we can change the SVN
> structure to match, since moving things around in Subversion is cheap.
> 
> * I'd suggest that we tag each subproject release before it is rolled.
> Ideally, the tag should identify exactly what goes into a given subproject
> release.
> 
> * Obviously, I don't care if we keep the tags in subdirectories or in a
> master directory at the top. My only concern is that it is easy to tag
> only the resources that pertain to a given release.
+1
> * I haven't done any SVN tagging myself, but someone who does said it was
> easier to create the tags if we we used a
> 
>   /$subproject
>    ./tag
>    ./trunk
> 
>   structure.  Of course, it might be just as easy to keep them all at the
> root. I haven't had a chance to try yet.
I have done a tag for the last .NET release and 
it's very easy you can put your tag in any directory (root ou sub).

> * If someone wants to forward this post to a SVN guru, that would work for
> me :)
> 
> It will be a couple of days before the repos are rolled over, and we don't
> have to start shuffling things around right away, so time is not of the
> essence.
> 
> -Ted.

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
 

Reply via email to