+1 for the structure proposed by Clinton /branches (as required) /tags (as required) /trunk ./java ../mapper ../dao ../docs ../jpetstore ./cs ../mapper ../dao ../docs ../npetstore
-----Message d'origine----- De : Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : dimanche 16 janvier 2005 05:42 À : roberto Cc : ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org Objet : Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long]) This is what I really don't like....multiple trunk folders is horrendous. # /java # * ./core (SQL Maps) # ** ../trunk # * ./dao # ** ../trunk # * ./docs # ** ../trunk # * ./jpetstore (we can just commit the latest version) # ** ../trunk The root of the repos should (IMHO) be: /branches (as required) /tags (as required) /trunk ./java ../mapper ../dao ../docs ../jpetstore There's no need to split it up at a project level in the root, nor is there any reason to have multiple trunks. Cheers, Clinton On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:35:54 -0500, roberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Clinton, I think Ted updated his suggested dir structure in the Wiki Roadmap > page: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/ibatis/Roadmap > > > > The final structure (after some intermediate structure he has also proposed > due to the move) is a little similar to yours with the diffs being: > > > > · the location of the branches/tags directories (created as needed) > > · the trunk dir (each subdir has its own) > > · the docs dirs (one each in Java and .NET/C# subdir) > > · and the 2 *PetS* dirs (one each in Java and .NET/C# subdir) > > > > I'm pasting in that proposed final structure and some of his text into this > email so it's quicker to see for other folks on this email list: > > > > > > > So, the root folders are > /cs > /java > /site > > Of these, /java and /cs each have subfolders. Each of the subfolders have > their own trunk. > /java > * /core > * /dao > * /docs > * /jpetshore > /cs > * /core > * /dao > * /docs > * /npetshop > * /tutorial > > The /site folder has the Forrest sources for the website, and it's own > /trunk > > Any folder that needs a tags folder (or branches folder) can create one as > needed. But there's no point in creating one until it's needed. > > > > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Clinton Begin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:11 PM > > > To: ibatis-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: ASF TODO [short] (was ASF TODO [long]) > > > > > > -1 On SVN directory structure > > > > > > Oops, I don't like the idea of having multiple /tags and /trunk > > > directories. I really don't see the advantage, and it may just make > > > the repository harder to browse. I don't like calling the root > > > directory of the project "Source", because we have more than source > > > within a project structure, as well as the fact that there is another > > > source directory below that. I don't like "/Source/iBatisJava/src/", > > > which is what we'd end up with (both redundancy and contradictory). > > > I'd rather stick with the more traditional approach, and keep the root > > > of the trunk at a "project" level (not referring to project artifacts > > > like "source"). So I'd suggest something like this: > > > > > > /branches > > > /tags > > > /trunk > > > ./iBatisNet > > > ./NPetShop > > > ./iBatisJava > > > ../ibatis-1 > > > ../ibatis-2 > > > ./JPetStore > > > ../jpetstore-1 > > > ../jpetstore-2 > > > ../jpetstore-3 > > > ../jpetstore-4 > > > ./site > > > ./documentation > > > ../tutorial > > > ../devguide > > > > > > +1 on separating DAO (later) > > > > > > This shouldn't be an issue to do this later. I've always wanted to do > > > this, but never had the motivation. :-) This could either happen > > > below the .NET and Java source directories if we still considered them > > > part of the same project, or we could rename iBatisNet and iBatisJava > > > to NetMapper and JavaMapper respectively. Then introduce NetDAO and > > > JavaDAO (or whatever) later. These points are less important because > > > SVN makes our lives somewhat easy in this respect. More important is > > > the previous discussion of the root of the repository. > > > > > > +1 on the removal of 3rd party (non-ASF) libraries. > > > > > > I'll remove all non-ASF libraries tomorrow and write devsrc code for > > > them (like I did for TopLink). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Clinton > > > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.12 - Release Date: 14/01/2005
