Yeah, easy repository migration, moving and merging is something the
SVN team could have done a little better.

I'm going to try to get the non-ASF stuff out before we migrate.

Cheers,
Clinton


On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:53:04 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:32:20 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> > Cool.  I have the tarball from SourceForge.  I was planning on
> > converting the repository from CVS to SVN and rearrange it as
> > described.  Can our ops guys merge two SVN repositories?  Or is
> > that a nightmare?  Is it easier if I just leave it as CVS?
> 
> I asked on the infrastructure list about merging and joining, and which way 
> would be the best to go, but didn't get a response.
> 
> I had thought we could just give them both tarballs and let whoever does it 
> do the best they can. Once it was up, we could refactor it there.
> 
> But, if we'd like to submit a more finished product to the ASF, we could ask 
> WUSH.NET if they could convert the CVS and merge it our existing SVN 
> repository. They did this for me with the Struts CVS, when we were deciding 
> whether to go with SVN or not. The response time has always been good, 
> generally over night.
> 
> Or, if you want to convert and refactor it yourself, we could get the SVN 
> dump of that, and see if WUSH.NET can merge it into ours.
> 
> We could then get the dump of the combined WUSH.NET SVN and hand that to the 
> infrastructure guys.
> 
> 
> > Also, with regard to the 3rd party (non-ASF) DLLs (Hibernate etc.),
> > are you physically deleting them from the repository (can you do
> > that with SVN)?  I was going to delete the ,v file from cvs
> > entirely, so that the 3rd party jar files aren't even in history.
> 
> It's not easy to remove any artifact from SVN. You can do it, but it's messy. 
> But if we are transferring a dump, I believe we might be able to excise the 
> folder in transit. (Beam me up, Scotty ... and can you remove the mole while 
> you are at it?)
> 
> The key point is whether the ASF is distributing a *GPL binary with it's own 
> distribution. We haven't had an ASF distribution yet, so we are clear on that 
> point.
> 
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> 
> -Ted.
> 
>

Reply via email to