I was also thinking of that. +1 The next version will be under Apache. I'm thinking doing it at the end of the month.
On 5/19/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/18/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1.0.1.321 is started to show signs of age. > > Regardless of what we do next, I wondered if we wanted to upgrade the > quality of 1.1.0 to "General Availability". Under our lightweight > release strategy, this just means changing the label on the website. > > I've been using it for months with no problems and much joy :) > > Sure, the next release may be better (thanks for all the reports and > fixes everybody!), but that doesn't mean 1.1.0 isn't good. > > Here's my +1 for GA. > > -Ted. >
