+1 Yay! IBATISNET-43 (the solution file issue) got fixed.
--- Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was also thinking of that. > +1 > > The next version will be under Apache. > I'm thinking doing it at the end of the month. > > On 5/19/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/18/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1.0.1.321 is started to show signs of age. > > > > Regardless of what we do next, I wondered if we wanted to upgrade > the > > quality of 1.1.0 to "General Availability". Under our lightweight > > release strategy, this just means changing the label on the > website. > > > > I've been using it for months with no problems and much joy :) > > > > Sure, the next release may be better (thanks for all the reports > and > > fixes everybody!), but that doesn't mean 1.1.0 isn't good. > > > > Here's my +1 for GA. > > > > -Ted. > > >
