Can't wait for the next release!
Roberto
On 5/19/05, Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was also thinking of that.
+1
The next version will be under Apache.
I'm thinking doing it at the end of the month.
On 5/19/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> On 5/18/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1.0.1.321 is started to show signs of age.
>
> Regardless of what we do next, I wondered if we wanted to upgrade the
> quality of 1.1.0 to "General Availability". Under our lightweight
> release strategy, this just means changing the label on the website.
>
> I've been using it for months with no problems and much joy :)
>
> Sure, the next release may be better (thanks for all the reports and
> fixes everybody!), but that doesn't mean 1.1.0 isn't good.
>
> Here's my +1 for GA.
>
> -Ted.
>
