Sorry if this is a stupid question... Is there, or has there been any requirement of increasing the 80 byte record limit of jcl? Reading the "PARM=" thread with interest, I can imagine having much longer jcl records would be a great thing if we suddenly have up to 65K of parm data available.
Thanks. Dave Low ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
