In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/31/2005 at 03:16 PM, john gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>It will he helpful to go back in time to the early years of OS/MFT >for the System/360. FSVO early. Also, "OS/MFT" should be OS/360, and the rules were the same[1] whether or not you generated the MFT option. >What was different then was that, even for keyword statement >parameters, no mechanism for replacing their values individually >was made available unless those values were also parameters of >a cataloged procedure. That changed with the advent of instream procedures (Release 14?) around 1968. [1] Except for things that depended on the presence or absence of spooling. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html