Maybe some of the member names in the two PDS files are identical? Concatenations will only return the *first* occurence of a given unique member name, all other members named identically below that first one are ignored.
That explanation, however, can't explain the difference between the two runs. I would think the number of uniquely-named members was identical, unless someone added a new uniquely-named member to one of them in between those two runs. HTH Peter -----Original Message----- From: Tom Savor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ISRSUPC - Odd Behavior Cross posted with ISPF group: Seeing some odd behavior with ISRSUPC (SuperC) scan in Batch: <Snipped> _ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
