In a message dated 6/9/2005 5:34:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Wouldn't the TCB in the primary address space get charged for the >time? No. The issuing TCB would be charged for time spent in the issuing TCB; it would not be charged for time spent in another address space unless there is enclave processing for the CAS. I assume that a good chunk of the work done by CAS is an TCB mode, e.g., DYNALLOC, OPEN. I said primary above but I meant home. I am confused. Ed Jaffe says when in Xmem mode the home address space is charged for CPU time (he meant the home's current TCB). JES2 is always the home space in this situation. JES2 PCs into CAS in order to do an SVC 26. So JES2 is now the home and primary but CAS is the secondary. Then CAS PCs into VLF in order to avoid an I/O. JES2 is still the home, CAS is now the primary, and VLF is the secondary. Whatever work CAS and VLF do should be charged to JES2's TCB, shouldn't it? Bill Fairchild ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
