In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/10/2005
at 06:46 PM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>1. that work done by a TCB is charged to the TCB and its home address
>space (or enclave) EVEN WHEN it runs in cross memory mode in another
>address space. I count cross memory time as "time spent in another
>address space."
I guess that we will have to agree to disagree as to whether it is the
addressing mode[1] or the dispatching status that is relevant. But
would you take it to the extreme of saying that code was running in
CAS whenever it loaded an AR with an ALET for the CAS?
[1] Loosely including PASN and SASN as part of addressing mode.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
