In a message dated 6/20/2005 8:32:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
National SECURITY Agency ? Nevermind, IMHO word 'security' in the name is very bad reason to wear a gun. Security as the need sounds better. BTW: Let's assume the following "Hollywood" scenario: ... many of the killed policemen in U.S. were killed by their own guns. I didn't mean to seem as if I were defending their policy or their raison d'être. I am merely reporting on one policy of theirs. They are concerned about more aspects of security than just their many acres of computers, obviously. That's why their facility is located in the middle of a large U.S. Army base. Their armed guards are all active duty military personnel, and they fully understand their own personal expendability. Hollywood scenarios and other arguments against their policy will have more effect if they are sent directly to the NSA's Acting Director William B. Black, Jr. Bill Fairchild ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
