As the missing source code problem is popping up now and then, I'm thinking that maybe it would be a good idea to include the source code (compressed) in the load module, like you could do when compiling REXX programs. This would guarantee that you always have a source code matching the running programs.
I think that the performance implications would (in general) be small today. Thomas Berg -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Ted MacNEIL Skickat: den 28 augusti 2005 02:00 Till: [email protected] Ämne: Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT) >I feel your pain .. at one place I worked they had 90000+ load modules and they had 25 year old modules (cobol) and no source. ... Even IBM has source & object that don't match. Anything over 1K programmes introduces major issues. As much as I would like us all to be current with COBOL, I would still be a proponent of attrition, rather than 'en masse'. -teD In God we Trust! All others bring data! -- W. Edwards Deming ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
