On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:03:22 -0500, Chris Mason 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>...
>Yes, the whole design is a total mess. I suggest you hit your IBM
>support with this shoddy design with as much force as you can
>muster. It's incompetence piled on incompetence, in the 
>implementation *and* the description. It shows what can 
>happen when the "suits" force a "quick-and-dirty" enhancement 
>and use developers who clearly don't understand the environment 
>in which they are working to implement it.

I don't have any of the inside IBM connections that Chris has so I 
can't say he is wrong, but I see this much differently on a number
of points.  

1.   The product is "working as designed".  If you want this changed
you're going to have to submit a Requirement with a very strong
business case.  Fixing USS design flaws isn't going to be very
high on anybody's list.

2.  If  "siuts" were involved I think they were those that decided 
staffing levels.

3.  I may be thinking designers rather than developers,  but I
don't think "incompetence" is an operative word here.  On the 
TCP/IP side this is a very small group (possibly one person) working
on less than stellar code.  On the VTAM side I suspect it is down to 
about nobody - not for the USS part.   Rather than incompetence,
I suspect  this is a matter of wanting to touch a house of cards as 
little as possible. 

>...
>Instead the "people of inadequate intelligence" have amazingly 
>done the exact opposite. 

Once again,  I may be thinking designer rather than developer, but
I think this is a very unfortunate characterization.  He is in no way 
"of inadequate intelligence".

>...
>I'm guessing that the reason they shied away from altering the
>USSMSG macro ...  is that they didn't want to involve the SNA
>(VTAM) side of the Communication Server house in their clandestine
>enhancement. 

I think it much more likely that there was nobody on VTAM side to
work on it.   They are (he is?) stretched pretty thin.    

>It's cheaper if you just impose the change in the TN3270 server
>logic.

Or possibly that was the only way to get it done at all.

Pat O'Keefe

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to