Scott Rowe pisze:
I think the real question here is: Why don't you have a SYSPLEX? There is
little to no cost involved, and many benefits.
I dare to disagree. Strongly disagree.
At least you have to pay for memory for CF, ICF engine, more CP cycles,
GRS delays, significantly more sysprog effort.
Looking from benefits perspective: depending on your regulations and
laws you would have to have production and test separate, so you need
more than one sysplex. Every serious shop I know keeps test/dev/sandbox
separate from production. That means several sysplexes or monoplexes.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci
wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca
2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec
podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym
BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
