<snip>
We have 3 LPARs configured as monoplex.  One for our Production
environment, one for our Test/QA environment, and one for our
Application Development environment.

>From this discussion, it sounds like everybody is saying even we would
benefit from Sysplex.
</snip>

The purpose of a sysplex is z/OS availability. I commonly go 3 months
between outages (production IPL's) and I am in the middle of creating 2
base sysplex's. 1 for test/dev/QA, and 1 for production. After this
project is complete, I expect to be able to go to 1 production outage
annually (mainly to harden any dynamic changes to the IODF and/or
processor microcode) and perhaps longer. A parallel sysplex would be
wasted money unless you have 2 or more CECs.

The technical difference between a base and a parallel sysplex is the
Coupling Facility (whether it be internal or stand-alone) and a sysplex
time reference (external) and all of the functions that depend on a CF
(GDPS, VTAM generic resources, hot failover, multi-node persistent
sessions, log streams, JES Checkpoint, ...). The design difference is in
the degree of availability. In a properly designed parallel sysplex, one
could expect 99.9999% availability of *ALL* applications and z/OS itself
(about 31 sec of down time annually). The best I expect with a base
sysplex is somewhere between 99.99% and 99.999%  (5 min and 52 min
respectively). Many of the things I would *like* to do are only
available in a parallel sysplex, so I have to do without those
functions. I can do everything I *have* to do in a base sysplex.

With deference to Barbara, RACF is not a problem. It runs just fine
without the CF, but can exploit one if available.

One last note, without a CF, many sysplex functions do not scale well to
more than a few images. GRS is a notorious example, as would the JES
checkpoint. With only 2 systems in each plex (PROD & DEV/TEST/QA) you
should not have any significant issues. The Merging Systems into a
Sysplex Redbook (SG24-6818) is a great reference, but does omit some
functions that have become available since it was published in 2002.

HTH, 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to