On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:01:42 -0700, Gibney, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
> >True, and last time we revamped the IODF I had the required CTC(s) >added. That was over a year ago when we brought in the z9-BC and is the >last time I had a chance to take a baby step that direction. Also, on >this list, I'm led to understand that our four would LPARs push or >exceed GRS ring performance. > Yes, for the "old" GRS ring, 4 systems would probably be a bigger performance hit than you would ever want. However, if you set up a basic sysplex, GRS performance using XCF is better than dedicated CTC links. Especially since you can have FICON CTCs. Dedicated GRS links (what I referred to as "old" above) can't get any faster than ESCON in basic mode. So even XCF links using ESCON in CTC mode is faster and may give you acceptable performance with 4 systems. As usual, YMMV. I can't say I have been in any 4 system GRS ring (using XCF) shops in the last 10 years, so perhaps someone with that configuration can share. I do have plenty of experience with GRS ring prior to sysplex and I can say that even a 3 system ring presented some performance.. um... challenges. :-) Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
