>>On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:01:42 -0700, Gibney, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm led to understand that our four would LPARs push or exceed GRS ring >>performance. >From: Mark Zelden [email protected] > I can't say I have been in any 4 system GRS ring (using XCF) shops > in the last 10 years, so perhaps someone with that configuration can share. we have such configuration. We recently added a 4th LPAR to our existing 3-LPARs basic sysplex. I had the same concerns as Dave's, but after more than one month I can say GRS ring (exploiting XCF) is not a problem. I use RMF PM to keep on eye on XCF delays, and the average delay GRS shows is around 4 %. Which is acceptable to me. We have still a 2086-230, z/OS 1.7 everywhere except z/OS 1.9 on the sandbox LPAR. Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH Munich - Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
