Greetings,
   We're in the midst of a migration to virtual tape. I defined the
virtual devices as 3590's. I assigned them esoterics so we can direct
some to be replicated to a remote virtual tape device. Replication is
based on data written to certain devices.

   Things started out great. These devices are fast. But now I find
when I run a JOB with multiple tape allocations in one step specifying
the same esoteric, they all try to mount on the same device. Is this
normal ??? I don't recall ever seeing this before with our other
devices. I ran the JOB again specifying the generic unit name and they
allocated separate devices and the JOB ran good.

   Any pointers are appreciated.

Thanks,
    Dave K.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to 
whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person 
other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. 
OppenheimerFunds may, at its sole discretion, monitor, review, retain and/or 
disclose the content of all email communications. 
==============================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to