Kopischke, David G. pisze:
Greetings,
We're in the midst of a migration to virtual tape. I defined the
virtual devices as 3590's. I assigned them esoterics so we can direct
some to be replicated to a remote virtual tape device. Replication is
based on data written to certain devices.
Things started out great. These devices are fast. But now I find
when I run a JOB with multiple tape allocations in one step specifying
the same esoteric, they all try to mount on the same device. Is this
normal ??? I don't recall ever seeing this before with our other
devices. I ran the JOB again specifying the generic unit name and they
allocated separate devices and the JOB ran good.
The same device should be chosen when you specify AFF:
UNIT=AFF=previous_ddname_with_tape_alloc
Another guess is you esoteric contains only one device ONLINE.
BTW: Just curious - what hardware do you use? It is interesting for me
because of 3590 emulation.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci
wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca
2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec
podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym
BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
