> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [On Behalf Of Neil Duffee
>
> On 2009-12-02 at 12:14 concerning "Re: question on STORAGE function -
> TCB may become non-dispatchable?", John Chase <[email protected]>
> wrote to IBM-Main :
>
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
>
> > > [snip] why [snip] bypass normal CICS storage services [snip]
sounds
> > > very much like a case of "Doctor, it hurts when I do this..."
>
> > The original request was for experiences / advice on using 64-bit
> > storage "directly" in CICS, but CICS doesn't support that (yet).
That
> > eventually led to this thread.
>
> "Yet" being 2007 (or 2004).
You apparently missed "directly" above.
> CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Release Guide Version 3 Release 2
((c)
> Copyright IBM Corp. 2007) : Chapter 19. Storage management above the
> 2GB boundary
>
> CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Release Guide Version 3 Release 1
((c)
> Copyright IBM Corp. 2004, 2008) : Chapter 18. 64-Bit Addressing
> Toleration changes
Please cite the syntax for an application program to obtain storage
above the bar. E C GETMAIN doesn't do it.
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
