In <[email protected]>, on
12/02/2009
at 10:08 AM, "McKown, John" <[email protected]> said:
>There is an ongoing discussion on the CICS-L list about doing a STORAGE
>macro or GETMAIN/FREEMAIN. Some are saying that these functions can
>result in a "wait" for the CICS QR TCB (the TCB under which most of the
>CICS transactions are run).
They can result in a delay for the local lock. So can using CICS services
that do a STORAGE or GETMAIN under the covers. If that's a performance
issue then it's time to investigate splitting the CICS address space.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
