I think so to, but it is not my decision to make.

Perhaps one of our sysprogs will read this and get that discussion restarted 
amongst themselves.  I have tried to nudge them in that direction in the past, 
but nothing has come of it.
-- 

Frank Swarbrick
Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development
FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO  USA
P: 303-235-1403


On 12/4/2009 at 2:47 PM, in message <[email protected]>, Scott
Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, Ted, I think he's figured that out.
>  
> Frank, as I've mentioned before, I really think you guys need to re-visit the 
> Sysplex question again.  There is really no reason to not be running at least 
> a base Sysplex, it should vastly improve things there.  IIRC, you are running 
> GRS in ring mode without a Base Sysplex, which is a really poor performer.  
> There are many benefits and zero cost in changing to a base Sysplex from 
> there.
> 
>>>> Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> 12/4/2009 4:17 PM >>>
>>Exactly my point.  Someone asked me why I said we didn't want to use PDSE to 
> solve my issue and I said because we can't share them well, because we're not 
> in a Sysplex.
> 
> You can't share regular PDS datasets either.
> 
> 
> -
> Too busy driving to stop for gas!
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html 
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains 
> confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee.  If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received 
> this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, 
> distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited.  If 
> you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) 
> reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase 
> or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, 
> amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have 
> accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you.
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

>>> 

The information contained in this electronic communication and any document 
attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
examination, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail 
and destroy this communication.  Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to