On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:03:12 -0600 Chris Craddock <[email protected]> wrote:
:>If you're creating ANY kind of PC routine you should use a stacking PC. :>Basic PCs are a pain and they're only there for compatibility. There is no :>reason to use one for anything new. If you use a space-switch stacking PC, :>then the PR instruction is guaranteed to put you back where you were before :>the PC. If you use a basic ss-PC you have to go through the usual charade of :>issuing PT and then SSAR to get back to where you came from - which is error :>prone to say the least. Isn't the basic PC a lot faster than the stacking variety? -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
