Rebecca, Although you say you don't have FDRMOVE but do have other Innovation products, I would suggest you give Innovation a call and talk it over with them on how best you can utilise the products you do have to achieve what it is you are trying to do.
Stephen Mednick Computer Supervisory Services Sydney, Australia Asia/Pacific representatives for Innovation Data Processing, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rebecca Martin Sent: Sunday, 21 February 2010 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Consolidate Storage Groups Thanks Tom, we do have some of their products but not FDRMOVE. Looks like we would not need to move datasets to consolidate storage groups. But if/when we want to clean up the storage classes, we would. We have over 100 storage classes. So that really needs to be cleaned up as well. Does anybody have any recommendations for approach to reduce this to a reasonable number? What would you consider reasonable? What happens if you eliminate a SMS storage class but still have datasets assigned to it? All my earlier searching was focused on storage groups so I'll go back and do it again for storage classes. I think our 1st priority will be reducing the storage groups but want to quickly also tackle the storage class issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
