> Lots of interesting stuff in there, much of which probably should be in the mainstream books.
Roger that -- both of your points. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Best practice for 24-bit storage in assembler called from C/C++ On 23 February 2010 13:38, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > I guess the fundamental question is this: will something outside of my code > give me that one task-unique word? I am beginning to think it will not. The > problem pseudo-registers seem to solve is " one GETMAIN for many DSECTs -- > even across separate compilation units" -- not "give me some task-unique > storage." I keep coming back to the same problem: there's no way anything > stored inside your code could possibly be reentrant-task-unique. Check out the Anchor Support section, chapter 15 in, of all user-friendly places, the Language Environment Vendor Interfaces book. Lots of interesting stuff in there, much of which probably should be in the mainstream books. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
