In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/17/2005
at 09:51 AM, Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I knew about the /20 not really being a 360, but why not the /40?
Typo[1]; I meant 360/44.
>Are you, perhaps, referring to the /44,
>which had some unusual features but would at least run 360 code
Not SS instructions.
>(as long as you didn't need the commercial instruction set)?
It was missing more than that, e.g., MVC. But there was a feature that
allowed you to run a simulator from hidden memory.
[1] I could blame it on my flaky keyboard but I'm fairly sure that it
was my fingers out-typing my brain.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
