Sorry, guys, but I have to take the other side. The vendor has *no* control over how you implement the software. Or if you choose to remove a piece and replace it. Or if you configure it such that it does not behave as it is supposed to.
So, take some auditors trying to grapple with a really complex issue and you get some really foggy questions. Worse, they are bound to be making some really, ah, interesting 'suggestions'. We gotta come up with some really good answers, and fast. IBM, your customers are hurting here! My $0.02. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353 Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Module description Shouldn't any competent auditor who is asking about a vendor's programs know that they have to ask the vendor, not the user? Shouldn't your only response have to be "Ask IBM"? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
